Many of our readers may not be aware of how review topics are selected for inclusion in the Annual Review of Entomology. This is a difficult and often complex procedure that the Editorial Committee…
Writing a good review paper requires both considerable time and effort. It is particularly gratifying therefore that the Annual Review of Entomology manages to attract so many eminent contributors …
How valuable is the Annual Review of Entomology to its readers? The most basic function of a scientific review is to provide an up-to-date source of useful references on a given subject. A good rev…
Annual Review of Entomology-readers, authors, and editorial committee members- is keenly aware. If the first half of this century belonged to the theoretical physicists, the second half is clearly …
With this volume of the Annual Review of Entomology, my colleagues Frank J. Radovsky and Vincent H. Resh join me as the designated Editors of the Review. This change in their status (from Associate…
Volume 42 marks the close of a remarkable era for the Annual Review of Entomology (ARE). Its three Editors, Thomas E. Mittler (Vol. 8-42), Frank J. Radovsky (Vol. 24-42), and Vincent H. Resh (Vol. …
Since my introduction to the Annual Review of Entomology as an un dergraduate student at Oregon State University over 20 years ago, the Review has been a mainstay of my personal library and continu…
I wonder if students of entomology really appreciate the value of the Annual Review of Entomology. Of course they use it frequently and probably come to rely on it, but I doubt they often stop to t…
As readers may know, there is a standing invitation to entomologists to offer suggestions for topics to be reviewed in the Annual Review of Entomology. Many valuable suggestions are provided by ent…
Once again this preface provides the Editorial Committee with an op- portunity to thank the contributors for the time and effort that have made the presentation of this volume possible. The prepara…